HOMESTUDY- Program Evaluation: Assessing Life Threatening Behavior and Systemic Family Therapy

Your name (optional)

(enter a space or . into the box if you wish to remain anonymous)

Are you a psychologist:

What is your professional status:

Years in profession:

Reason for selecting this program?

Please rate if you believe the objective, Identify 3 ways of using best practices for assessing life threating behaviors., was met during the training:

Rate if you believe the following objective, Define at least 3 ways to document assessment or intervention for life-threatening behaviors., was met during the training:

Rate the following:

Instructional level of program was appropriate for a post-doctoral training:

Rate the following:

Content aligned with a postdoctoral level training.

Rate the following:

The contents could be applied to my practice or work context.

Rate the following:

The quality of the materials provided was appropriate

Rate the following:

Instructor [Jennifer Benjamin]

Knew the subject matter:

Rate the following:

Instructor Jennifer Benjamin

Taught the subject competently:

Rate the following

Instructor 1 Jennifer Benjamin

Elaborated upon the stated objectives

Rate the following

Instructor 1 Jennifer Benjamin

Presented content in an organized manner.

Rate the following

Instructor 1 Jennifer Benjamin

Maintained my interest

Rate the following

Instructor 1 Jennifer Benjamin

Answered questions effectively

Rate the following

Instructor 1 Jennifer Benjamin

Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

Rate the following

Instructor 2 Pinky Mehta

Knew the subject matter

Rate the following

Instructor 2 Pinky Mehta

Taught the subject competently

Rate the following

Instructor 2 Pinky Mehta

Elaborated upon the stated objectives

Rate the following

Instructor 2 Pinky Mehta

Presented content in an organized manner

Rate the following

Instructor 2 Pinky Mehta

Maintained my interest

Rate the following

Instructor 2 Pinky Mehta

Answered my questions effectively

Rate the following

Instructor 2 Pinky Mehta

Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions

The program flyer was informative and accurate

The registration process for this program was clearly communicated on the flyer.

Prior to the training, an email was sent to announce the workshop reviewed how to 1, successfully complete the program, 2, if there is a conflict of interest.

Accuracy and utility of the materials presented and basis of such statements, the limitations of the content being taught and the severe and most common risks was provided in the power point.

Any conflicts of interests with the CE program and the instructor(s) due to commercial, financial, relational or presentation were disclosed.

Special needs were met?

Virtual only

Access to the program internet platform was provided in a clear manner?

To what degree did the program increase your self-awareness of your own bias, prejudice, or ignorance?

To what degree did the program result in an increase in your baseline of cultural literacy for understanding potential clients?

To what degree did the training increase your awareness of the necessity to incorporate cultural competence into your intervention with potential clients?

To what degree did this training increase your awareness of the systemic issues regarding social justice, and the necessity to be a leader and advocate for potential clients?

How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice and other professional development?

Did this program enhance your professional expertise?

Would you recommend this program to a colleague?

What was your overall impression of the activity? What went well?

What could have been improved?

How will the information change how you practice?

What topics would you like to see as future CE presentations?

Other comments?